Prosperity 2030: the plan to abolish council tax, stamp duty — and income tax
Published by UCL's Institute for Global Prosperity on 9 July 2026 and endorsed by an adviser to the incoming Prime Minister, Prosperity 2030 is the most sweeping tax redesign put in front of British politics in decades: one annual property tax instead of council tax and stamp duty, and one "National Contribution" instead of five taxes on income and wealth.
What's proposed
Prosperity 2030 is a five-year programme of structural reform aimed at the cost of living. Its authors are explicit that changes this large need a democratic mandate: nothing would begin until after the public has voted at the next general election (due by 2029), with the programme running from 2030. The two headline moves:
- Property: abolish council tax and stamp duty, replacing both with a 1% annual tax on current property values — ending what the report calls "the absurdity of a modest terrace paying proportionally more than a high-value mansion". A deferral option would ensure no one is forced to sell to pay it.
- Income and wealth: abolish income tax, employee and self-employed National Insurance, dividend tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax, replacing all five with a single progressive "National Contribution" on income from every source. The authors project £52 billion more revenue in year one, rising to £75 billion after five years — from simplification and better collection rather than higher borrowing.
The rest of the programme expands public services and infrastructure spending, funded by those revenues. City AM summarised it as a call for the incoming Burnham government to launch a "£100bn tax reform package".
The case for
- Council tax is based on 1991 values and capped at Band H; stamp duty punishes moving. One flat percentage of today's value fixes both distortions at once.
- Merging five overlapping taxes into one removes cliff edges, avoidance seams (dividends vs salary, gains vs income) and a huge compliance burden.
- It has cross-spectrum endorsements — including Lord O'Neill of Gatley, a former Conservative Treasury minister who now advises Andy Burnham.
The case against
- 1% is a big number. On a £600,000 home that's £6,000 a year — roughly double the Fairer Share Proportional Property Tax (0.48%) and far above most current council tax bills in the South East. Deferral softens but doesn't remove the sticker shock.
- Revenue projections are contested. £52–75bn extra from "simplification" assumes behavioural responses go the authors' way; the OBR has never scored anything like it.
- Transition risk. Replacing the entire personal tax system in one parliament would be the largest fiscal engineering project since PAYE was introduced in 1944.
Where the parties stand
No party has adopted Prosperity 2030. Its property half overlaps with the Proportional Property Tax that Burnham has personally backed — the Conservatives have already dismissed Burnham-linked property tax reform, and Reform UK favours cutting stamp duty within the current system. The Greens' wealth tax shares the "tax wealth like income" instinct via a different route.
Your home under three property tax systems
Compare what you pay now with the Proportional Property Tax (0.48%) and the Prosperity 2030 tax (1%).
Your home
Sources & further reading
- Prosperity 2030 — the report — UCL Institute for Global Prosperity.
- UCL News, 9 July 2026 — the launch announcement.
- City AM — "Burnham told to launch £100bn tax reform package".
- Fairer Share — the 0.48% Proportional Property Tax it will inevitably be compared with.
Figures are from public material and may change. Not financial, legal or tax advice.